Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette Mcneilly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 2024No. A220468PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A22-0468 Court of Appeals Thissen, J. Concurring, Anderson, Thissen, JJ. Took no part, Procaccini, J. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Filed: May 8, 2024 Office of Appellate Courts Kristi Dannette Mcneilly, Appellant. ________________________ Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and Mary F. Moriarty, Hennepin County Attorney, Adam E. Petras, Assistant County Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for respondent. Robert D. Richman, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, for appellant. Paul Sellers, Minnesota Legal Defense, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Richard SmebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Ivan Contreras-SanchezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael TillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael TillmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026
- State of Minnesota, Appellant/Cross-Respondent v. Seneca Warrior Steeprock, Respondent/Cross-AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2025