City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LILLEHAUG, Justice.
For at least half a century, federal constitutional law has been clear: an administrative search warrant need‘not be supported by individualized suspicion of a code violation to justify an unconsented-to rental housing inspection. Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 U.S. 523, 538, 87 S.Ct. 1727, 18 L.Ed.2d 930 (1967). Such an administrative warrant satisfies the probable cause requirement in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution “if reasonable legislative or administrative standards for conducting an area inspection are satisfied with respect to a particular…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cruz-Guzman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. DaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- Forslund v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.