Legal Opinion
Duarte & Witting, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 2002No. C040142PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Duarte & Witting, Inc., doing business as Nader Chrysler-Plymouth (Nader), appeals from the trial court’s denial of its petition for a writ of administrative mandamus seeking to compel New Motor Vehicle Board (the Board) to hold an evidentiary hearing on the merits of a termination of Nader’s Plymouth franchise by real party in interest DaimlerChrysler Motors Corporation (DaimlerChrysler), pursuant to Vehicle Code section 3050 et seq. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Vehicle Code.) The reason for the termination of the Plymouth franchise was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Bunnett v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Consumer Health Care Council, Inc. v. Department of Managed Health CareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Nader Automotive Group, LLC v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
- Roadtrek Motorhomes v. Calif. New Motor Vehicle Bd. CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Ventimiglia v. Board of Behavioral SciencesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008