Legal Opinion
Nader Automotive Group, LLC v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 20, 2009No. C059144, C059180PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBIE, J.
In these two consolidated cases, plaintiffs Nader Automotive Group, LLC, and its general manager, Nader Eghtesad (collectively Nader), protested Nader’s termination as franchised dealers of Volkswagen of America, Inc., and Audi of America, Inc., the real parties in interest. The New Motor Vehicle Board (board) dismissed the protests based on Nader’s failure to comply with authorized discovery without substantial justification.
The dismissal was premised on Vehicle Code 1 section 3050.2, subdivision (b) (section 3050.2(b)), which reads in relevant part as follows: “The executive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial PerformanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Automotive Management Group, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Sonoma Subaru, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Tetra Pak, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Duarte & Witting, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doe v. United States Swimming, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Landers, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Morales v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
- People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- People v. LandersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019