Legal Opinion

Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial Performance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1999No. S064923PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This original writ proceeding presents the following issues: (1) whether the Commission on Judicial Performance (Commission) *375has authority to issue a confidential advisory letter (commonly known as a “stinger” letter); (2) whether the issuance of such a letter amounts to “discipline” that implicates a judge’s right to due process of law; (3) whether such a letter may be issued based upon a perceived legal error committed by a judge; and (4) whether petitioner here, Judge Richard J. Oberholzer, committed sanctionable legal error in dismissing a criminal case after the People…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Schwarm v. CraigheadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
  5. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API