Oberholzer v. Commission on Judicial Performance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
This original writ proceeding presents the following issues: (1) whether the Commission on Judicial Performance (Commission) *375has authority to issue a confidential advisory letter (commonly known as a “stinger” letter); (2) whether the issuance of such a letter amounts to “discipline” that implicates a judge’s right to due process of law; (3) whether such a letter may be issued based upon a perceived legal error committed by a judge; and (4) whether petitioner here, Judge Richard J. Oberholzer, committed sanctionable legal error in dismissing a criminal case after the People…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Schwarm v. CraigheadDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.