Legal Opinion

Bloom v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1923No. Civ. No. 4460PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Appeal from a judgment on nonsuit and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action for negligence caused by the alleged unskillful operation of an automobile driven by an employee of defendants, who are copartners doing business under the firm name of Allen & Doxsee, and also under the firm name and style of the Coast Line Freight and Stage Company. The occupation of the firm is that of carrying and transporting passengers for hire between the cities of Fort Bragg and Point Arena in the county of Mendocino, and between intermediate points to Cazadero, in the county of Sonoma.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Killmyer v. Wheeling Traction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Stieglitz v. SettleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. SwansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Leitz v. RosenthalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Purity Ice Cream Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Bakos v. Shell Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Colwell v. BothwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API