Legal Opinion

Purity Ice Cream Co. v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1937No. 27614PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, X

The Purity Ice Cream Company, defendant below, appeals from a judgment in the sum of ,$2,500, rendered against it, and in favor of Elmer Morgan, plaintiff below. The cause of action is one for damages for personal injuries sustained bv plaintiff as the result of an automobile collision.

On January 29, 1936, the streets of the city of Tulsa were covered with ice and snow. Peoria street in Tulsa runs north and south, while King street, intersecting, runs in a general east and west direction. Both streets are paved, but King street is very narrow and the center surface of it is higher…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barret v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. Deantonio v. New Haven Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Rockwell v. Standard Stamping Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Arnold v. BreretonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Bloom v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stout v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. McGilvray v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Kellogg Sales Co. v. HolroydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API