Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Swanson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1925No. Docket No. 4992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J., pro tem.

The plaintiff, Southern Pacific Company, a corporation, brought this action to recover from defendant, Elsie Ann Swanson, $1,350, alleged to be due it as rent for a certain store building at 36 Steuart Street, San Francisco. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case, defendant made a motion for a nonsuit, which was granted. Judgment for defendant followed; from this judgment the plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

The facts developed at the trial are these: In August, 1917, Charles J. Swanson, the husband of the defendant,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Austin v. . MunroNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Eustace v. JahnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Harm v. FrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. First National Trust & Savings Bank v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Burns v. McGrawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Richfield Oil Corp. v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Lesser v. PominCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API