Legal Opinion

United States v. Burton

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 15, 2009No. 07-0848/AFPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge RYAN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

At different points during the closing argument on findings in this ease, trial counsel suggested that the members of the panel could compare the similarities between charged offenses for a propensity to commit “these types of offenses” and see the accused’s modus operandi. Although the charged offenses were themselves the proper subject of closing argument, the underlying conduct had not been offered or admitted under Military Rules of Evidence (M.R.E.) 404 or 413. Trial counsel’s invitation to the panel to compare the charged offenses to find…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. HillsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  2. United States v. SewellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  3. United States v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
  4. United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  5. United States v. Sergeant ERIC F. KELLYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API