Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 30, 2017No. 16-0336/CGPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge OHLSON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial with enlisted representation convicted Appellant of aggravated sexual assault, aggravated sexual contact, and indecent exposure, in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2006). The court-martial also convicted Appellant of violating a lawful general order by engaging in sexual harassment, maltreatment, making a false official statement, aggravated sexual contact, abusive sexual contact, and committing a general disorder by using a female Guardsman’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. United States v. WeeksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  5. Felkins v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Sergeant ERIC F. KELLYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  2. United States v. Chief Warrant Officer Four ELMER F. HOFFMAN, IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. United States v. ClifftU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2019
  5. United States v. GomezNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API