Legal Opinion
United States v. Sewell
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided February 1, 2017No. 16-0360/ARPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court.
A general court-martial composed of officer members convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of six specifications of indecent acts and one specification of assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Articles 120 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 934 (2006 & 2012). The MJ dismissed Appellant’s Article 80, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 880 (2012), charge for attempted rape, and the panel found Appellant not guilty of ten other specifications, including indecent exposure, unlawful touching, impeding an investigation,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- United States v. SchroderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. AndrewsNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. ArnoldUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2018
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.