Legal Opinion

Kashman v. Haas

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 2002No. 54A05-0112-CV-528PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Christopher and Rita Beth Kashman (collectively, "Buyers") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Ricky and Becky Haas (collectively, "Sellers") and the trial court's denial of Buyers' motion to correct error. Buyers raise two issues, which we restate as:

1. Whether the trial court erred when deciding whether to grant Sellers' motion for summary judgment because the trial court failed to consider a graph, which Buyers had attached to their amended complaint and designated as evidence in response to Sellers' motion for summary judgment; and

2. Whether the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stephenson v. LedbetterIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCutchan v. BlanckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Verrall v. MacHuraIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Hizer v. HoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Reum v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Mercho-Roushdi-Shoemaker-Dilley Thoraco-Vascular Corp. v. BlatchfordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API