Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
This case illustrates the operation of our 1991 amendments to Indiana Trial Rule 56. In moving for summary judgment, both parties were obliged to designate the evi-dentiary matter upon which their legal contentions rested. On the basis of the material so designated, the trial court properly granted summary judgment for the defendant.
Facts and Procedural History
Richard A. Rosi was employed by Business Furniture Corporation (BFC) as manager of its carpet and floor covering department until October 1987, when he was terminated after his department was eliminated. Rosi…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Babinchak v. Town of ChestertonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Jackson v. BlanchardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Bain v. Board of Trustees of Starke Memorial HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by223 opinions
- Williams v. TharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
- USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- AutoXchange. Com, Inc. v. Dreyer and Reinbold, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Durham Ex Rel. Estate of Wade v. U-Haul InternationalIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.