Legal Opinion

Mercho-Roushdi-Shoemaker-Dilley Thoraco-Vascular Corp. v. Blatchford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 5, 2009No. 84A01-0801-CV-30PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant/Cross-Appellee-Defen-dant/Counter-Plaintiff, Mercho-Roushdi-Shoemaker-Dilley Thoraco-Vascular Corporation (MRSD), appeals from the trial court's summary judgment ruling that the non-compete clauses signed by Appel-lees/Cross-Appellants-Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, James W. Blatchford, III, M.D. (Blatchford) and Eve G. Cieutat, M.D. (Cieutat), are unenforceable. Blatch-ford and Cieutat cross-appeal, arguing that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of MRSD on Counts I-VII of Blatchford and Cieutat's Complaint.

We…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Raymundo v. Hammond Clinic Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  2. W & W Equipment Co., Inc. v. MinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C. v. KruegerIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Meyers v. MeyersIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tuf-Tread Corp. v. KilbornIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brian L. Cain, Nancy Ilderton and Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC v. Old National Bancorp, Inc. (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Hribar Transport LLC v. SlegersDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
  3. Mercho Roushdi Shoemaker Dilley Thoraco Vascular Corp. v. James W. Blatchford, III, M.D., and Eve G. Cieutat, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. STEAK N SHAKE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. IFOOD, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API