Legal Opinion

Hizer v. Holt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2010No. 71A03-1002-PL-127PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Kent and Elizabeth Hizer ("the Hizers") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of James and Rebecca Holt ("the Holts") on the Hizers' claims for fraud and breach of contract arising from the Hizers' purchase of the Holts' home. Concluding that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the Holts made fraudulent misrepresentations on the Sales Disclosure Form required by statute, we reverse the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of the Holts and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Facts and Procedural History

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Cagney v. CusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Vanderburgh County Election Board v. Vanderburgh County Democratic Central CommitteeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Indiana Bank & Trust Co. of Martinsville v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Dickerson v. StrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WysockiIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Wise v. HaysIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In Re Estate of LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Vanderwier v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. David T. Hays and Amanda G. Hays v. Deborah J. WiseIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API