Legal Opinion

Verrall v. MacHura

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 2004No. 45A03-0309-CV-359PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Andrew and Susan Verrall appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment as to Eric Machura's fraud claims arising from the sale of a home. Several issues are raised on review that we consolidate as: Did the trial court err in denying the Verralls's Motion for Summary Judgment?

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 2001, the Verralls (Sellers) determined to sell their home located at 925 S. East Street in Crown Point, Indiana (the Residence). Sellers had lived in the Residence since 1997 after purchasing it from Paul and Constance Myres. Before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Adoptive Parents of M.L v. v. WilkensIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Barnard v. Saturn Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Kashman v. HaasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. StrandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. McCutchan v. BlanckIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Hizer v. HoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Basham v. PenickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Reum v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API