Legal Opinion
Hylton v. Frank E. Rogozienski, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 23, 2009No. D053371PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Plaintiff Eldon Hylton filed a complaint against his former attorney, defendant Frank E. Rogozienski, seeking damages and rescission of a contingency fee contract based on Rogozienski’s alleged misfeasance in connection with his professional representation of Hylton. Rogozienski moved to strike the complaint pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 425.16, commonly referred to as the anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) statute. (Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc. (2002) 29 Cal.4th 53, 57 [124 Cal.Rptr.2d 507, 52 P.3d 685] (Equilon).)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. LaMarcheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Chodos v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fremont Reorganizing Corp. v. FaiginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Tuszynska v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.