Legal Opinion

Brunacini v. Kavanagh

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1993No. 14638PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONNELLY, Judge.

This interlocutory appeal raises the issue of whether the trial court erred in denying Defendants’ (the Law Firm’s) motion to dismiss the legal malpractice action brought by Mayme Brunacini and Brunacini Appliance Company (Plaintiffs). The sole question presented on appeal is whether Plaintiffs’ claim of legal malpractice was a compulsory counterclaim that was required to be raised in the Law Firm’s prior action against Plaintiffs to recover legal fees. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the motion to dismiss and hold that Plaintiffs’ malpractice claim was a…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Grunwald v. BronkeshSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hennekens v. HoerlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Las Luminarias of the New Mexico Council of the Blind v. IsengardNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Williams v. StewartNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Sharts v. NatelsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Computer One, Inc. v. Grisham & Lawless P.A.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Allen v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API