Legal Opinion

Jones v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 1989No. 87-881PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELSON, Associate Judge:

This appeal presents the question whether the trial court can use its contempt power to enforce a condition of probation after the expiration of the probationary period. We hold that the trial court cannot do so.

Appellant Derrick A. Jones pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of malicious destruction of property, D.C.Code § 22-403 (1981). The trial court sentenced him to sixty days in jail, suspended execution of the sentence, and placed appellant on supervised probation for one year. As part of the terms of probation, the court required appellant to pay restitution in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Maggio v. ZeitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Mulky v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Swisher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Matter of RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Cabinet for Health & Family v. J.M.G.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API