Legal Opinion

Matter of Robertson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1992No. 91-SP-730PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This matter is before the court on the recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that we suspend respondent from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for 90 days and order him to pay a former client $7,191.61 in restitution. Although neither respondent nor Bar Counsel opposed the Board’s recommendation, the case was assigned to the regular calendar for oral argument. Neither party filed a brief in this court. Upon reading the Board’s Report and Recommendation, however, we asked the parties to focus their argument on the issue of restitution.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of JamesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Sloan v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Matter of RussellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In Re RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In Re HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API