Legal Opinion

Mulky v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1982No. 81-433PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This ease presents the question whether the trial court, when revoking probation, must require the defendant to serve the sentence originally imposed and suspended (before the grant of probation), or instead may impose a new, lesser sentence. See D.C.Code 1973, § 24-104. 1 We conclude that the trial court has discretion to impose any sentence that the court could have imposed upon conviction, provided that the new sentence is no more severe than the original sentence. Accordingly, after revoking appellant’s probation, the trial court did not err in imposing a sentence…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Peoples Drug Stores, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API