Legal Opinion
Smith v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1991No. 90-1232PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
In January 1990, the trial court suspended imposition of a sentence after appellant had pleaded guilty to attempted unlawful use of a vehicle, D.C.Code §§ 22-103, -3815 (1989). The court placed him on probation for one year under the Youth Rehabilitation Act (YRA), D.C.Code § 24-803(a) (1989 & Supp.1990). Nine months later, the trial court revoked appellant’s probation and sentenced him as an adult to 180 days in prison, with all but 30 days suspended, placing him on work release to be followed by one year of supervised probation conditioned on appellant’s attending…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Richard B. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Ralston v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Office of People's Counsel v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Peterson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Veney v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Dung Phan v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Edward Towles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.