Legal Opinion
Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & Morgan
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 30, 2003No. E030006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1357Opinion
HOLLENHORST J.
This legal malpractice action was tried to a jury in 1998. The jury found that defendants were negligent and that the negligence caused damages to Davcon in the sum of $246,704.51. The trial court, Judge Trask, granted an oral motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and Davcon appealed.
In Davcon v. Roberts & Morgan (E023781; nonpub. opn. filed November 17, 2000) we found the trial court’s grant of the oral motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was a nullity.1 We therefore reversed the judgment notwithstanding the verdict and remanded with directions to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Van Beurden Insurance Services v. Customized Worldwide Weather Insurance AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jane Doe 8015 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bravo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- In Re Needles CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Paul Blanco's Good Car Co. Auto Group v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2020