Legal Opinion
Jane Doe 8015 v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2007No. H030303PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, Acting P. J.
This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a coordinated action against the real parties in interest, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, SmithKline). The only issue raised in the petition is whether a party in a coordinated action who successfully challenges a summary judgment on appeal may thereafter exercise a peremptory challenge of the judge presiding over the coordinated proceedings. We conclude that such challenges are permitted under Code of Civil Procedure section 170.6, subdivision (a)(2),…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Stephens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Stegs Investments v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Swift v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Orion Communications, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In Re Needles CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Orion Communications v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Prescription Opioid CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.