Legal Opinion
In Re Needles Cases
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 9, 2007No. H030303Published
1Opinion of the Court
55 Cal.Rptr.3d 708 (2007)
148 Cal.App.4th 489
In re NEEDLES CASES.
Jane Doe 8015, et. al., Petitioners,
v.
The Superior Court, Respondent,
SmithKline Beecham Corp. et. al., Real Parties in Interest.
No. H030303.
Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District.
March 9, 2007.
Smoger & Associates and Gerson H. Smoger, Oakland, for Petitioners.
No Appearance for Respondent.
Drinker, Biddle & Reath and Charles F. Preuss, Alan J. Lazarus, Thomas W. Pulliam, Jr. and Michelle A. Childers, San Francisco, for Real Parties in Interest.
ELIA, Acting P.J.
This petition for a writ of mandamus arises from a coordinated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McLaughlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Peracchi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Stephens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Stegs Investments v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.