Legal Opinion
Bravo v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 23, 2007No. B195593PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, J.
Petitioner Arthur W. Bravo challenges the trial court’s striking of his peremptory challenge under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 170.6 on the grounds his complaint was related to a prior action before the same trial judge and therefore the challenge was untimely. We find the second action was not a continuation of the first action and therefore that Bravo’s challenge, filed two days after assignment of his case to the trial judge, was timely. We grant the petition.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On May 9, 2005, Bravo filed a complaint against the County of Los…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Stephens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Barrett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- City of Hanford v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pickett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Birts v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- MANUEL C. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Yannoulatos v. Superior Court CA2/4California Court of Appeal · 2020