State v. McManus
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant was found guilty after a bench trial of the crime of criminal activity in drugs (ORS 167!207), namely, possession of seven marihuana seeds. The seeds were found in defendant’s automobile as a result of a search pursuant to a warrant.
On appeal defendant contends that the trial judge erred in the following particulars:(1) In denying defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence seized under the search warrant;(2) Because “* * * [t]he court had no jurisdiction to convict defendant of any crime because in order to be guilty of violating ORS 167.207, one must possess a usable quantity of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Nathanson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RadiMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. McManusOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. GravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. GravenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.