Legal Opinion

State v. Paola

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 6, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a companion case to State v. Shaw, 3 Or App 346, 473 P2d 159, Sup Ct review denied, in which an opinion was handed down by this court on this date. The defendant in the case at hand makes two assignments of error.

His first assignment of error is that the evidence seized from the automobile in which he was apprehended should have been suppressed as the product of an unreasonable search. The search was held proper in State v. Shaw, supra.

His second assignment of error is that certain prejudicial testimony was improperly admitted at the trial. He concedes that no objection to such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AventOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. AbelOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Long v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. State v. BurgessCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. State v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API