Legal Opinion
Wold v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 11, 1936No. 31,052PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings Avas granted. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied, and it appeals.
The following facts are concededly established: On September 20, 1921, defendant, in consideration of $45.06 and a like sum to be paid annually thereafter, issued and delivered to plaintiff its policy of insurance upon his life in the amount of $2,000, payable at his death. The policy also contained the following provision:
“Total and Permanent Disability Benefit Provision.
“If the insured hereunder, after the payment of one full year’s premium on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kassmir v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Berset v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Reliance Motor Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Short v. Great Northern Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Kundiger v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Knudson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Rein v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Berke v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.