Legal Opinion
Rein v. New York Life Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 1941No. 32,578PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff’s action to recover on an insurance policy issued by defendant upon the life of her lately deceased husband resulted in a verdict in her favor. The court, however, on defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial, granted the former but denied the latter. Plaintiff appeals from that order.
The policy, issued June 28, 1937, in the amount of $5,000, provided for “double indemnity” if the insured should die from accident as therein limited and defined. It also contained this provision :
“Upon receipt by the Company at its Home Office…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Stark v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Shaughnessy v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Kassmir v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gabrelcik v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Hockemeyer v. PoolerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Phil G. Ruvelson, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- National Surety Corp. v. Michigan Fire & Marine Ins.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1944
- Moore v. Pilot Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.