Legal Opinion

Reliance Motor Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1926No. 24,992PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant insurance company for judgment or a new trial. The action was brought on a policy of fire insurance, was tried by jury and a verdict returned in respondent’s favor for $370. A reversal of the order is sought because respondent failed to make proofs of loss within 60 days after the fire and because the verdict is- excessive.

The property insured was a motor truck which one Maki had purchased from respondent under a conditional sales contract. Maki had taken out the policy in his own name, but at the trial it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Teasdale v. City of New York InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Elder v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. First National Bank v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Ceylon Farmers Elevator Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. Burrell Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Wold v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Avon State Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API