Reliance Motor Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant insurance company for judgment or a new trial. The action was brought on a policy of fire insurance, was tried by jury and a verdict returned in respondent’s favor for $370. A reversal of the order is sought because respondent failed to make proofs of loss within 60 days after the fire and because the verdict is- excessive.
The property insured was a motor truck which one Maki had purchased from respondent under a conditional sales contract. Maki had taken out the policy in his own name, but at the trial it was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Providence Washington Insurance v. WolfIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Teasdale v. City of New York InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Elder v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- First National Bank v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Ceylon Farmers Elevator Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Allen v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Progressive Mutual Insurance v. Burrell Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Wold v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Avon State Bank v. BancInsure, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Gulbrandson v. EMPIRE MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.