Legal Opinion
Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 15, 1932No. 297PublishedCited by 312 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
This is an action brought to recover the sum of $5,000 life insurance and specified disability benefits upon a policy issued by the respondent to Carl Oscar Bergholm on March 13, 1926. Judgment upon a verdict for peti tioners in the trial court was reversed by the eourt of appeals. 50 F. (2d) 67. We granted certiorari because of a supposed conflict with Minnesota Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Marshall, 29 F. (2d) 977.'
Beginning with February 27, 1927, premiums were to be paid quarterly, with a grace period of one month from any due date, during which period the policy was to continue in full force.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Klein v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by312 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Stroehmann v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- George N. Pierce Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
307 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.