Legal Opinion

Richards v. Office Products Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 5, 1977No. E-77-11PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, P. J.

This cause of action and appeal result from an intersection collision of two vehicles. Plaintiff Anna Richards was a passenger in one, and the other was driven by defendant Jack Hevner.

The original complaint asked only for compensatory damages. Liability was admitted by the defendants and the defense that Hevner was acting outside the course of his employment was not raised in the pleadings or at trial.

Well in advance of the trial date, plaintiffs, appellants herein, filed an amendment to their complaint and the trial court, on November 12, 1975, permitted the plaintiffs to amend their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Focht v. RabadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Pelletti v. MembrilaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Gearhart v. AngeloffOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Johnson v. KnippOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. California Housing Finance Agency v. E.R. Fairway Associates ICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Detling v. ChockleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Peterson v. HenningAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  4. Baber v. DennisOhio Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Edmondson v. SteelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API