Legal Opinion

California Housing Finance Agency v. E.R. Fairway Associates I

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 1995No. C017619PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

E.R. Fairway Associates I et al. (collectively defendant) appeal from a postjudgment order awarding plaintiff California Housing Finance Agency (CHFA) attorney fees and costs totaling $243,808.68. In awarding attorney fees the trial court concluded: (1) CHFA was the prevailing party in the action for breach of contract (Civ. Code, § 1717); and (2) various agreements, some of which contain an attorney fee provision i.e., a promissory note and deed of trust, and some which do not i.e., a regulatory agreement and a management contract, are, properly construed, parts of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. KGO-T v. Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. USS-POSCO Industries v. Floyd CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. People v. TillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Carwash of America-PO LLC v. Windswept Ventures No. I, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API