Legal Opinion

Gearhart v. Angeloff

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1969No. 6171PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuNsickek, P. J.

In this appeal on questions of law, the chief question revolves around a problem where actual and punitive damages were awarded against Robert Angeloff, and compensatory damages against his brother, Karl, partners in the operation of a bar in the city of Akron, Summit County, Ohio.

Tommy Gearhart, then twenty years of age, the plaintiff (appellee), entered the Elbow Grille on Arlington Street, Akron, Ohio, and purchased some beer. While he was seated at the bar, another person entered the Grille and caused a disturbance. One of the defendants, Karl Angeloff (an appellant), a partner in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Petrey v. LiuzziOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Levin v. Elyria Sign Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Detling v. ChockleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Zora H. Gillham v. The Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Ranells v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Drayton v. Jiffee Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API