Legal Opinion

Detling v. Chockley

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1982No. 81-1192PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question of whether evidence that a civil defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol at the time of an automobile accident in which he has admitted negligence is alone sufficient to raise a jury question *136of punitive damages. For the reasons discussed herein, we answer the question in the negative.

Punitive or exemplary damages have long been allowed in civil tort actions in Ohio which involve ingredients of fraud, malice or insult. Roberts v. Mason (1859), 10 Ohio St. 277. “Such damages being punitive in their nature are an exception to the general rules that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Leichtamer v. American Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Saberton v. GreenwaldOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Rubeck v. HuffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Bush v. Kelley's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Tuttle v. RaymondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. Villella v. Waikem Motors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance v. SaidOhio Supreme Court · 1992

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API