Legal Opinion
Portz v. Pipestone Skelgas
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 9, 1986No. C4-86-1066PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Lyle Portz appeals a determination that he did not have good cause to quit his job with Pipestone Skelgas. We affirm.
FACTS
Pipestone Skelgas (“Pipestone”) hired Lyle Portz in March 1976 to distribute and service Pipestone’s products. Portz voluntarily quit that job in November 1985 and applied for unemployment compensation benefits, claiming that he resigned due to severe job stress because of the following problems:(1) Charles Wallerich, Portzls,immediate supervisor, assigned Portz’ co-worker easy tasks and required Portz to do difficult work, such as ditch digging and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ferguson v. Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Cary v. Custom Coach, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Helmin v. Griswold Ribbon & TypewriterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Foy v. J.E.K. IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carlson v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Esselman v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Jenson v. Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Ryks v. Nieuwsma Livestock EquipmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Kern v. Savanna Golf & Supper ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.