Legal Opinion

Ryks v. Nieuwsma Livestock Equipment

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 11, 1987No. C0-87-491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Relator Gordon Ryks seeks review of a determination by the Commissioner of Jobs and Training that he did not have good cause to quit his job with the respondent employer. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Gordon Ryks began working for the respondent Nieuwsma Livestock Equipment as a route salesman and repairman in March 1981, when Nieuwsma was awarded a dealership by the Surge Company. For IIV2 years prior to that time, Ryks had worked for Willmar Surge, which had previously been the local Surge dealership.

Ryks was hired by Nieuwsma’s owner, Bill Nieuwsma, according to the same…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. Porrazzo v. Nabisco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Forsberg v. Depth of Field/FabricsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Portz v. Pipestone SkelgasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kehoe v. Minnesota Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Shanahan v. District Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Benson Giwa, Relator v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Lamont P. Mays, Relator v. Rosenbauer Motors, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API