Legal Opinion

Foy v. J.E.K. Industries

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1984No. C5-84-309PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

This is an appeal by the relator, J.E.K. Industries, Inc., from a determination by the commissioner of economic security that the employee, John Foy, should be allowed unemployment benefits. We find that the commissioner’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence, and we therefore reverse.

FACTS

The respondent, John Foy, was employed by J.E.K. Industries from May, 1970 until May 18, 1983. At the time he left his employment with J.E.K., Foy held the position of vice president in charge of sales and marketing. In 1972 Foy had purchased 5 percent of the stock of J.E.K.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Group Health Plan, Inc. v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Sunstar Foods, Inc. v. UhlendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Scott v. Photo Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Portz v. Pipestone SkelgasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Ryks v. Nieuwsma Livestock EquipmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Harringer v. AA Portable Truck & Trailer Repair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Bongiovanni v. Vanlor InvestmentsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Haskins v. Choice Auto Rental, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API