State v. Lane
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The defendant’s only assignments of error are to the denial of his motions for a continuance and a mistrial. He contends that his request for a continuance was based on a right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, sections 11 and 17 of the North Carolina Constitution.
Ordinarily, whether a case shall be continued rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. “But when the motion is based on a right guaranteed by the the Federal and State Constitutions, 14th Amend., U. S. Const., Art. I, sections 11 and 17, N. C. Const., the question…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- State v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.