Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1962No. 653PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s only assignments of error are to the denial of his motions for a continuance and a mistrial. He contends that his request for a continuance was based on a right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and by Article I, sections 11 and 17 of the North Carolina Constitution.

Ordinarily, whether a case shall be continued rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge. “But when the motion is based on a right guaranteed by the the Federal and State Constitutions, 14th Amend., U. S. Const., Art. I, sections 11 and 17, N. C. Const., the question…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. . FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. FarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API