Legal Opinion

State v. Farrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1943PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaeNI-iill, J.

Ordinarily, whether a cause shall be continued is a matter which rests in the sound discretion of the trial court and, in the absence of gross abuse, is not subject to review on appeal. S. v. Allen, 222 N. C., 145; S. v. Wellmon, 222 N. C., 215, and cases cited; S. v. Rhodes, 202 N. C., 101, 161 S. E., 122. This rule is so firmly established in this and other jurisdictions as to become axiomatic. It is not debated here.

But when the motion is based on a right guaranteed by the Federal and State Constitutions, 14th Amend., U. S. Const., Art. I, sections 11 and 17, N. 0. Const., the question…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. North v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Commonwealth v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. TolleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. CradleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API