State v. McKenna
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUSKINS, Justice.
Prior to arraignment defendant moved to dismiss the murder charge on the ground that, prior to trial, he had not been served with an arrest warrant, indictment, or other criminal process informing him of the particulars of the charge against him. After a voir dire hearing, the trial judge made findings of fact and concluded as a matter of law that defendant had shown no prejudicial denial of his constitutional rights. Denial of the motion to dismiss constitutes defendant’s first assignment of error.
Defendant contends he was denied due process in that he was not adequately…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.