Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of George H. Otterness

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 26, 1930No. 27,620PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

Proceeding on complaint of the state board of law examiners for the discipline of George H. Otterness, an attorney at law, hereinafter referred to as the defendant.

One charge against the defendant is that he made a contract with one Charles A. Oberg, an attorney at law of this state, for the transfer or turning over of defendant’s law practice at Willmar, Minnesota, to Oberg. The referee found that it was in effect agreed between them that defendant should transfer to Oberg all his law business, with certain specified exceptions, and should not thereafter practice law at Willmar, and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Board of Examiners in Law v. DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. In re Removal of HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  3. Swift v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Illinois State Bar Ass'n v. Peoples Stock Yards State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. GoodmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hexter Title & Abstract Co. v. Grievance CommitteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API