Legal Opinion

Heintze v. New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 21, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The prosecutor was convicted in a penal action in the Camden District Court of violating section 10 of chapter 221 of the laws of 1921, in that he practiced medicine and surgery within the meaning of section 8 of said act, without having been duly licensed so to do.

At the outset of the trial he pleaded not guilty through his counsel, who then proceeded to a number of what he called “motions,” which were presented in writing, numbered 1 to 18, inclusive, and are printed in the case. Not one of them is a motion, or calls upon the court to take…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Board of Medical Examiners v. O'NeillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Granger v. AdsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  2. State v. BostonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API