Miller v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
This is an action to reform a policy of public liability insurance so as to designate and name plaintiff as the assured therein in place of the Kenesaw Hotel Company, a corporation, and for the recovery of damages thereunder as so reformed. Plaintiff alleged that he was not named as the assured in the policy because of mis take or fraud on the part of defendants. The case was tried to the court without a jury. The action was dismissed as to the defendant Arthur P. Smith Company. The court’s findings were that on or about August 27, 1926, plaintiff made application to defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sommers v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Haley v. Sharon Township Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Bredesen v. NickolaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Logue v. DucheneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- Langford Electric Co. v. Employees Mutual Indemnity Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Iverson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- In Re Estate of DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957