Logue v. Duchene
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
For injuries' sustained in an automobile collision plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant. Appellant Avas garnisheed and disclosed. Not satisfied Avith the disclosure, plaintiff filed a supplemental complaint, to Avhich appellant interposed an ansAver. The issues thus made were tried to the court, resulting in findings in plaintiff’s favor. The garnishee’s motion for amended findings being denied except in part, judgment was entered, from Avhich it appeals.
Upon the car driven by defendant and which caused the injuries to plaintiff, appellant had issued a liability insurance policy.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodbury Savings Bank & Building Ass'n v. Charter Oak Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1863
- Esch Bros. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Komula v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Lumbermen's National Bank of Menominee v. CorriganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
- Robbins v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bettinger v. Northwestern Nat. Cas. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Hartigan v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Beach v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. HoweDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance v. SommersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.