Haley v. Sharon Township Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Le Snenr county to recover $600 upon defendant’s insurance policy. Tbe ease was tried before Tifft, J., wbo made findings and dismissed the complaint on the merits. Erom an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff: appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Plaintiff appeals from an order denying a new trial of an action brought to recover on a fire insurance policy.
The case was tried by the court without a jury and the findings were that, on October 11, 1911, one Michael Haley applied in writing to the defendant for fire insurance on his dwelling house to the amount of $900, and on the contents of the house to the amount of $600. The application was approved and a policy issued and delivered to Haley. It was not written in accordance with the application, in that it did not cover "the contents of the house,■ containing instead a clause…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hunt v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Pitcher v. . HennesseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Wierengo v. American Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Fort Valley Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Wolfgang v. Henry Thiele Catering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Norem v. Iowa Implement Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Swedeen v. SwedeenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.