Legal Opinion

Sommers v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1931No. 28,529PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendants appeal from the judgment.

Plaintiffs, taxpayers of the city of St. Paul, brought this action to enjoin the city and its officials from adopting and making effective a budget and appropriations for the departments and activities of the city government for the year 1031, claiming that such appropriations were some $422,873 in excess of the limitation placed upon the cost of government of the city by its charter. The trial court sustained plaintiffs’ claim and granted injunction.

The facts were stipulated, and the court adopted the stipulation as its findings of fact. The only question…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wilder v. City of Saint PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  2. Northwestern Fire & Marine Insurance v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Oertel v. PierceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Pennington v. RobergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Wann v. Northwestern Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Independent School District No. 877 v. Loberg Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Village of Minneota v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Bicanic v. J. C. Campbell Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API