Legal Opinion

Collins v. Porter

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1946No. 393PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

Petitioners were stockholders in a distilling corporation on the dissolution of which in December, 1942, they received as their share of the assets warehouse receipts covering the bulk whiskey owned by the corporation. Early in January, 1943, they sold these receipts at a price above that fixed by the Administrator for bulk whiskey, Maximum Price Regulation 193, 7 Fed. Reg. 6006 (August 4, 1942), on the assumption that the receipts constituted “securities” expressly exempt from the pricing provisions.

On the basis of the sale of these certificates the Administrator, under § 205 (e) of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Pierre v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Conklin Pen Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Collins v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Allen v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Fleming v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  4. Van Der Loo v. PorterEmergency Court of Appeals · 1946
  5. Bowles v. GoldmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API