Legal Opinion

St. Pierre v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1943No. 687PublishedCited by 298 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Petitioner, who it is alleged had in his testimony before a federal grand jury confessed to the commission of the crime of embezzlement, refused to divulge the name of the person whose money he had embezzled. For the refusal the district court sentenced him to five months’ imprisonment for contempt of court, and the circuit court of appeals affirmed the judgment. 132 F. 2d 837. We granted certiorari, 318 U. S. 751, on a petition which raised important questions with respect to petitioner’s constitutional immunity from self-incrimination. In the order allowing the writ we requested…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt-Actien GesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. United States v. St. PierreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

3Cited by298 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Ginsberg v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

293 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API